India at crossroads with the US : drawing parallels from JAPAN
The Japan Story — From Boom to Bubble to Lost Decades
From Postwar Ruins to an Economic Miracle
In the aftermath of World War II, Japan was devastated—its industrial base shattered, cities destroyed, and economy in ruins. The United States, driven by a strategic imperative to contain communism during the Cold War, stepped in not only with financial aid but also with institutional and policy guidance.
This included:
Breaking up powerful monopolies (zaibatsu) into smaller, competitive firms.
Introducing Western management practices and corporate governance structures.
Integrating Japanese industries into U.S.-led global supply chains.
Japan's population, united by the pressing need to rebuild, embraced discipline and innovation. The result was extraordinary: by the 1970s and 1980s, Japan had become an industrial and export powerhouse — especially in cars, electronics, and precision machinery. An often-cited example of its economic moment: Tokyo land values were estimated to exceed the value of all property in California.
The Plaza Accord
By the mid-1980s, Japan’s export success created a huge trade surplus with the U.S.—while the U.S. was running chronic trade deficits. American companies complained that cheap Japanese goods were undercutting them. Politically, it became impossible for Washington to ignore.
In September 1985, at the Plaza Hotel in New York, finance ministers and central bankers from the U.S., Japan, West Germany, France, and the UK signed the Plaza Accord. The goal: a coordinated plan to weaken the U.S. dollar and strengthen the Japanese yen (and other currencies).
Economics behind it: a weaker dollar would make U.S. exports cheaper abroad, while a stronger yen would make Japanese goods costlier, theoretically reducing Japan’s trade surplus.
Why Japan agreed:
Alliance Maintenance: The U.S.-Japan alliance was foundational for Japan’s security and trade; refusing risked political fallout.
Diplomatic Gesture: Tokyo hoped currency realignment would calm anti-Japan sentiment in the U.S. Congress.
Economic Confidence: Policymakers believed the shift could be managed without major disruption.
Outcome: The yen rose ~50% against the dollar in two years. Japanese exports instantly became more expensive. Manufacturers faced slowing orders, and Japan’s central bank responded with ultra-low interest rates to stimulate the economy.
Easy Money, Irrational Exuberance, Crisis
Cheap credit poured into speculative investments in land and stocks rather than productive industry. Asset prices skyrocketed on the belief they could only go higher. This was a pure speculative bubble.
When it burst in the early 1990s:
Property values collapsed.
Stock markets tanked.
Banks were saddled with bad loans.
Many firms became “zombie companies,” kept alive by evergreening loans instead of innovation.
The government’s crisis response avoided hard reforms, prioritizing politically safe but economically hollow public works projects. Combined with a culture that valued consensus over disruption, Japan entered the Lost Decades — more than twenty years of stagnation, deflation, and lost growth potential.
Key Lessons from Japan
Relying too much on one export market makes you vulnerable to its political pressure.
Using easy credit is a short-term palliative; without reform, it breeds bubbles.
Protecting unproductive sectors slows renewal.
Institutional rigidity can become an economic liability.
Lessons for India
Overdependence on one export market is perilous.
Easy money solutions without deep reform can breed bubbles and stagnation.
Protecting failing sectors slows renewal and innovation.
Institutional rigidity makes crisis recovery harder.
India’s 2025 Moment — Promise, Pressure, and Policy
India is among the fastest-growing major economies (6.4–6.5% per year), powered by vibrant domestic demand, innovation, and ambition (aiming for $30 trillion GDP by 2047). But external challenges loom ever larger.
The U.S. Tariff Pressure—Magnitude and Motives
India exported about $90 billion to the U.S. last year (13–15% of total exports), mostly in textiles, gems/jewelry, automotive, machinery, and marine goods. The U.S. has now doubled tariffs from 25% to 50% on many of these, in response to Indian policy choices.
Full List: U.S. Demands of India
| U.S. Demand | What It Is |
|---|---|
| 1. Halt Russian oil imports | India imported $30–35 billion Russian crude in 2024–25 (~20% of oil needs) |
| 2. Open farm/dairy markets | End protection, allow U.S. agricultural/dairy surpluses into India |
| 3. Cut the U.S.-India trade gap | Allow freer market access for U.S. manufactured and processed goods |
| 4. Strengthen IP protection | Enforce stricter IPR for U.S. pharma, tech, and creative sectors |
| 5. Eased regulatory barriers, investor rights | Remove sectoral restrictions, ensure U.S. investment redressal |
Why India Is Resisting
Russian Oil: It keeps energy secure and inflation controllable. Forgoing it could fuel India’s energy import costs by 10–15%, spark over 6% CPI inflation, and undermine manufacturing and logistics sectors.
Agriculture/Dairy: These sectors employ 41% of the workforce (over 150 million people) and account for 17–18% GDP. Opening to subsidized U.S. imports risks millions of livelihoods, rural income collapse, and political instability (such as the farmer mobilizations between 2021 and 2023).
Strategic Autonomy: Ceding too much risks future sovereignty — policy must remain rooted in Indian realities, not foreign pressure.
Sector & State Exposure to U.S. Tariffs
| Sector | Major States | Tariff Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Textiles & Apparel | Maharashtra, Gujarat, Tamil Nadu, Punjab | Job losses, lost competitiveness, MSME stress |
| Gems/Jewelry | Gujarat/Surat, Rajasthan/Jaipur | Export shrinkage, loss of skilled jobs |
| Automotive Components | Tamil Nadu, Maharashtra, Karnataka | Supply chain shocks, layoffs |
| Marine Products | Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh | Coastal job distress, export fall |
| Machinery/Electronics | Maharashtra, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu | Engineering export risk, profit compression |
| IT & Pharmaceuticals | Pan India | Much less exposed (buffer sectors) |
Without a trade settlement, these sectors risk up to 20–30% export shrinkage to the U.S.—with possible 0.4–0.6% GDP growth impact, tens of thousands of jobs at stake, and pressure mounting in exposed states.
RBI’s Role—Past, Present & Future (Elaborated)
Past Milestones
RBI has been instrumental in cushioning India through global and domestic shocks, including the 2008 financial crisis and the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic, implementing liquidity injections and rate cuts.
Formal inflation-targeting adopted in 2016, with a midpoint target of 4% CPI and a 2% tolerance band.
Over the years, RBI sharpened banking sector regulations, strengthening frameworks for Non-Performing Assets (NPAs) and enhancing capital adequacy norms, increasing the resilience of Indian banks.
Promotion of digital financial inclusion and payment infrastructure has expanded economic participation, strengthening systemic resilience.
RBI in 2025
Early 2025: RBI cut the repo rate from 6.5% to 5.5%, and reduced the Cash Reserve Ratio to inject liquidity. Inflation hovered around a moderate 3.1%, allowing such easing without stoking overheating.
These measures encouraged bank lending, supported infrastructure investments, boosted digital economy growth, and buttressed domestic demand amid growing external trade uncertainties.
RBI is attentive to inflation, currency stability, and capital flow volatility, aware of potential knock-on effects from tariff pressures and global commodity price shocks.
Shift to Neutral
In August 2025, RBI shifted to a neutral monetary policy stance and held the repo rate steady at 5.5%. This move evidences a calibrated approach to balance growth support while preparing for inflation or external shocks. RBI is vigilant against:
Inflation spikes from higher energy prices or disrupted supply chains.
Excess liquidity fostering asset price bubbles as observed in Japan’s history.
Risk of “zombie lending”—propping up unproductive firms— which RBI aims to avoid through prudential regulations.
Future Prospects
RBI is prepared to tighten monetary policy if inflationary pressures intensify.
Conversely, additional easing remains possible if economic growth falters significantly.
It will keep the banking sector’s health under close watch, ensuring credit flows to viable businesses.
Coordination with government fiscal initiatives on infrastructure, innovation, and social safety nets is essential to maintain macroeconomic stability during this challenging global environment.
India’s Growing Equity Culture — A Double-Edged Transformation
Drivers of Growth
Widespread smartphone penetration and high-speed internet access.
User-friendly digital trading applications facilitating easy market entry.
Government financial literacy campaigns and investor awareness programs.
Shift of savings away from traditional assets like gold or fixed deposits due to relatively low yields.
Aspirations among the expanding middle class for wealth creation and financial participation.
Benefits to the Economy
Provides domestic companies with access to capital outside traditional bank financing.
Broadens wealth creation opportunities beyond the affluent elite.
Deepens capital markets, thereby improving economic resilience and investor participation.
Red Flags and Lessons from Japan’s Bubble
Surge in retail participation combined with momentum-driven trading exposes markets to speculative excesses and volatility.
Some sectors and stocks witness herd behavior, artificially inflating valuations.
However, India’s markets are better regulated—with enhanced governance, disclosure standards, circuit breakers, and regulatory initiatives by SEBI.
Financial literacy is improving, reducing the risk of uninformed or speculative investor behavior.
Unlike Japan’s bubble, driven by credit expansion and lack of oversight, India benefits from these stronger institutional safeguards and a more diversified economic base.
Why India Strongly Guards Farm & Dairy Sectors
Agriculture employs about 41% of the workforce and contributes 17–18% to GDP.
Millions of smallholder farmers and dairy producers depend on protective tariffs, subsidies, and regulatory policies.
U.S. pressure to open these sectors risks flooding Indian markets with subsidized US agricultural and dairy products, threatening livelihoods.
Political sensitivity remains high, with recent farmer protests underscoring the social and electoral significance.
Yielding could cause rural instability, loss of income, and significant political backlash both at state and national levels.
Mitigation Strategies & Sectoral Buffers
Diversify export markets aggressively by deepening trade ties with ASEAN, African, European, and Latin American countries.
Focus on tariff-immune or less-exposed sectors such as IT services, pharmaceuticals, chemicals, and domestic consumption-driven industries.
Foster “Make in India” initiatives, enhancing value addition and local supply chain robustness.
Leverage the expanding equity market to mobilize domestic capital, decreasing dependency on volatile export revenues.
RBI’s liquidity management and rupee stabilization efforts to buffer financial market volatility.
Social safety nets and fiscal measures targeting vulnerable populations and MSMEs affected by trade frictions.
Why India Is Not Japan
India benefits from a young and growing population, compared to aging Japan during its stagnation.
Domestic consumption drives India’s growth more so than export-dependence in Japan’s bubble era.
India’s vibrant federal democracy allows for policy adaptability and corrections.
The current multipolar geopolitical landscape offers India multiple strategic partners, unlike the bipolar pressure Japan faced.
Final Takeaway
India is confronted by external pressures reminiscent of Japan’s past but stands on a markedly different footing. With prudent RBI policy management, responsible nurturing of the equity culture, strong protections for sensitive sectors, and focused trade diversification, India can transform pressures into sustained growth and sovereign strength.
Learning from Japan’s mistakes means avoiding blind compliance with external demands, eschewing easy money bubbles without reform, and prioritizing structural resilience. Handled deftly, India’s present challenges can set a foundation for decades of independent prosperity.
Quantitative Annex — GDP & Sectoral Impact Estimates
| Demand/Impact Area | Estimate |
|---|---|
| 1. Halting Russian Oil Imports | $30–35 billion imports (~20% of crude) |
| Energy import bill rise 10–15%, CPI inflation up 1.5–2% | |
| GDP growth impact: −0.2% to −0.3%; manufacturing & transport hit | |
| 2. Opening Agriculture/Dairy Markets | 41% workforce affected; 150 million livelihoods at risk |
| Potential short-term rural income loss >1% of rural GDP | |
| High political risk and electoral volatility | |
| 3. U.S. Market Access (Trade Deficit Correction) | Possible export loss of $18–27 billion annually |
| GDP growth impact estimated at −0.4% to −0.6% | |
| 4. Stricter Intellectual Property Enforcement | Increased compliance costs |
| Possible rise in drug prices; moderate GDP impact | |
| 5. Delayed Trade Settlement | Capital outflows, currency volatility, cautious investor sentiment |
| Estimated loss of $4–6 billion in “waiting” FDI |
Buffers:
IT and pharmaceutical exports (~$275 billion) relatively insulated from tariffs.
Domestic consumption (~55% of GDP) cushions full impact.
RBI’s proactive liquidity and FX management provide financial stability.
Comments
Post a Comment